Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2008, 18:42:56 PM
Home Help Search Member Map Calendar Login Register
News: The light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off due to budget cuts.

Sponsored Links


Today at 11:09:55 Kat - Wizzyyyyy!
Today at 05:16:03 Lisa - iizzyyyyyyyyyyy
Yesterday at 23:54:24 dogsmum - Night 'Izzy'
Yesterday at 16:08:15 Taf - Izzy came back in her briefs !
Yesterday at 09:21:04 Lisa - damn you!! sneaking up on me
Total Twaddle  |  Idle Chat.  |  Twaddle's Soap Box  |  Topic: Big Blow For Bank Charges Victims 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Big Blow For Bank Charges Victims  (Read 628 times)
dogsmum
Smilie Queen
RSS Staff
Uber Twaddler
*******
Wales

Lovability: 217
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 30547


Wriggle it!


Awards Stats
« on: July 30, 2007, 22:43:24 PM »


 The Financial Services Authority has granted waiver to the banks, so that they are no longer obliged to handle complaints about unlawful bank charges.

No, this is not because it's ruled that charges are lawful. In fact, it's because the Office of Fair Trading thinks they aren't lawful, and is taking a super-claim to court to get the matter settled once and for all.

The banks being taken to court are: Abbey National, Barclays, Clydesdale, Halifax, Bank of Scotland, HSBC, Lloyds, Nationwide, NatWest and Royal Bank of Scotland.

And that's all fine. It'd be nice and neat to get one decision that settles the matter once and for all. However, it makes no sense that banks don't have to deal with claims in the meantime. It's ill-thought out, crazy even.

Thanks to the FSA, the situation now is that the banks don't have to deal with these claims at all. The FSA says also that the Financial Ombudsman will probably stop dealing with the claims and so will the county courts. This plays into the banks' hands.

Why on Earth should people halt their claims? There are lots of people with serious debt trouble largely, and in many cases solely, due to unlawful penalty charges, and now their claims will be suspended, perhaps for a year or several years, whilst we wait for the super-claim to be settled.

Their options for getting their money back in the meantime will be limited or non-existent, as their rights and protections are suspended. All the while, their debt will continue to grow, and their worry and anxieties along with it.

Furthermore, the FSA has, amazingly, agreed that claimants who have had offers from the bank already must either accept that offer in full and final settlement, or they'll almost certainly be forced to wait a long time, i.e. until this super-claim is finally resolved.

This puts those claimants with financial problems in a difficult and stressful position. It's a choice they shouldn't have to make, but the FSA wants to take away their right to get a proper response from the bank, and to take away their right to an ombudsman and to claim in the small claims court.

Sadly, it's almost certainly too late to salvage anything from this for existing claimants. The decision has been made apparently without anyone injecting the claimants' perspectives into it.

Consumers need a strong voice for the FSA to listen to, because clearly the Authority has been won over by the banks' self-serving arguments, which have been offered under the guise of 'fairness'.

Ditch your stinking bank for another stinking bank that pays more (or charges less) interest. Compare current accounts through The Fool.
Logged

Lisa
Salty Goodness
Admin
Resident Twaddler
*******
Wales

Lovability: 479
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 80407



WWW Awards Stats

Champion of
    
    
    
    

More>>
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2007, 05:09:08 AM »

that sucks!
Logged

If tears could build a stairway, and memories a lane. I'd walk right up to heaven to bring you home again.
Supreme Ruler of Lissyland
Total Twaddle Desktop Image
Taf
Sir Trumpalot
Twaddling Buddah
********
Wales

Lovability: 55
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 49953


The Old Ones Are Best


Awards Stats
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2007, 08:44:26 AM »

There is a back-story to this too... banks are charging to transfer credit card accounts... even though they say you have a 0% for x number of months on any transferred balances, they are charging a "fee" of around 2%... and this is raking-in more money than overdraft fees... and the FSA say they will sort that out "later".
Logged
Admiral-SirJohn
Restricted
Not Posted

United States

Lovability: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 0


Awards Stats
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2007, 08:50:41 AM »

I wonder if anyone is suing the FSA over this idiocy...
Logged
Mojo
Not lost...
Posting Boss
******
New Zealand

Lovability: 154
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 26324


Dangerous Jobs No 4. Polar Bear Alarm Clock.


Awards Stats
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2007, 08:53:14 AM »

Let me guess. Do the banks fund the FSA?? Roll Eyes
Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
Total Twaddle  |  Idle Chat.  |  Twaddle's Soap Box  |  Topic: Big Blow For Bank Charges Victims « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page Today at 14:54:33
Loans - Mortgages - Loans - Credit Cards